castle-windsor – Castle Windsor ArrayResolver尝试实例化一个无法解析的数组依赖项

使用ArrayResolver时,如果我注册了接口的多个实现和依赖于所述接口数组的类,我希望数组解析器注入可以成功解析的所有接口实现.如果无法解析该接口的已注册实现,则不会将其注入依赖类(显然),并且容器不会抛出异常.

从Windsor 2.5.1开始,ArrayResolver将在这种情况下抛出异常,但前提是它尝试实例化的类有多个构造函数.

我不确定这种行为的改变是否是故意的.我在2.5.1破坏性更改文档中没有看到任何可以让我相信这是故意的.

请参阅以下测试用例:

using System;
using Castle.MicroKernel.Registration;
using Castle.MicroKernel.Resolvers.SpecializedResolvers;
using Castle.Windsor;
using NUnit.Framework;

namespace CastleTests
{
    [TestFixture]
    public class TestArrayResolver
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// In this test,we register two implementors of IDependency,and a "DependsOnArray" class
        /// that depends on an array of IDependency.  The "UnresolvalbeDependency" cannot be
        /// resolved (because its dependency on "IUnimplementedDependency" is not satisfied)
        /// Hence,only the "ResolvableDependency" is injected into "DependsOnArray"
        /// </summary> 
        [Test]
        public void ArrayResolution_UnresolvableDependencyIsNotIncluded()
        {
            using (var container = new WindsorContainer())
            {
                container.Kernel.Resolver.AddSubResolver(new ArrayResolver(container.Kernel,false));
                container.Register(
                    Component.For<IDependency>().ImplementedBy<ResolvableDependency>(),Component.For<IDependency>().ImplementedBy<UnresolvalbeDependency>(),Component.For<IDependOnArray>().ImplementedBy<DependsOnArray>()
                    );
                container.Resolve<IDependOnArray>();
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// This test is identical to the above,except instead of registering "UnresolvableDependency"
        /// we register "UnresolvalbeDependencyWithPrimitiveConstructor",which is identical to
        /// "UnresolvableDependency",except for the fact that it has a second constructor acceptin a string.
        /// 
        /// I would expect this test to behave the same way as the above test,which it does in windsor 2.5,/// however in 2.5.1 and later,it fails with the following error message:
        /// 
        /// Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.ComponentActivatorException : Could not find resolvable constructor for CastleTests.UnresolvalbeDependencyWithAdditionalConstructor. Make sure all required dependencies are provided.
        /// </summary> 
        [Test]
        public void ArrayResolution_UnresolvableDependencyCausesResolutionFailure()
        {
            using (var container = new WindsorContainer())
            {
                container.Kernel.Resolver.AddSubResolver(new ArrayResolver(container.Kernel,true));
                container.Register(
                    Component.For<IDependency>().ImplementedBy<ResolvableDependency>(),Component.For<IDependency>().ImplementedBy<UnresolvalbeDependencyWithPrimitiveConstructor>(),Component.For<IDependOnArray>().ImplementedBy<DependsOnArray>()
                    );
                container.Resolve<IDependOnArray>();
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// this test fails with the same error as the above test,indicating that the issue is not related to the
        /// primitive vs. service nature of the second cosntructor's parameter
        /// </summary>
        [Test]
        public void ArrayResolution_UnresolvableDependencyCausesResolutionFailure_ServiceConstructor()
        {
            using (var container = new WindsorContainer())
            {
                container.Kernel.Resolver.AddSubResolver(new ArrayResolver(container.Kernel,Component.For<IDependency>().ImplementedBy<UnresolvalbeDependencyWithAdditionalServiceConstructor>(),Component.For<IDependOnArray>().ImplementedBy<DependsOnArray>()
                    );
                container.Resolve<IDependOnArray>();
            }
        }
    }

    public interface IDependency
    {
    }

    public class ResolvableDependency : IDependency
    {
    }

    public interface IUnimplementedDependency
    {
    }

    public class UnresolvalbeDependency : IDependency
    {
        public UnresolvalbeDependency(IUnimplementedDependency unimplementedDependency)
        {
        }
    }

    public interface IOtherUnimplementedDependency
    {
    }

    public class UnresolvalbeDependencyWithAdditionalServiceConstructor : IDependency
    {
        public UnresolvalbeDependencyWithAdditionalServiceConstructor(IUnimplementedDependency unimplementedDependency)
        {
        }

        public UnresolvalbeDependencyWithAdditionalServiceConstructor(IOtherUnimplementedDependency dep)
        {
        }
    }

    public class UnresolvalbeDependencyWithPrimitiveConstructor : IDependency
    {
        public UnresolvalbeDependencyWithPrimitiveConstructor(IUnimplementedDependency unimplementedDependency)
        {
        }

        public UnresolvalbeDependencyWithPrimitiveConstructor(string str)
        {
        }
    }

    public interface IDependOnArray
    {
    }

    public class DependsOnArray : IDependOnArray
    {
        public DependsOnArray(params IDependency[] dependencies)
        {
            foreach (var dependency in dependencies)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(dependency.GetType().Name);
            }
        }
    }
}

下面的完整堆栈跟踪如下:

at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.SelectEligibleConstructor(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 288
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 104
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 85
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\AbstractComponentActivator.cs: line 75
at Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Lifestyle\SingletonLifestyleManager.cs: line 50
at Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.ResolveCore(CreationContext context,Boolean requiresDecommission,Boolean instanceRequired) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Handlers\DefaultHandler.cs: line 61
at Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.AbstractHandler.Resolve(CreationContext context,Boolean instanceRequired) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Handlers\AbstractHandler.cs: line 770
at Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.AbstractHandler.TryResolve(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Handlers\AbstractHandler.cs: line 376
at Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.TryResolveComponent(IHandler handler,Type service,IDictionary additionalArguments) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\DefaultKernel.cs: line 899
at Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveAll(Type service,IDictionary arguments) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\DefaultKernel_Resolve.cs: line 293
at Castle.MicroKernel.Resolvers.SpecializedResolvers.ArrayResolver.Resolve(CreationContext context,ISubDependencyResolver contextHandlerResolver,ComponentModel model,DependencyModel dependency) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Resolvers\SpecializedResolvers\ArrayResolver.cs: line 71
at Castle.MicroKernel.Resolvers.DefaultDependencyResolver.Resolve(CreationContext context,DependencyModel dependency) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Resolvers\DefaultDependencyResolver.cs: line 239
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateConstructorArgumentsCore(ConstructorCandidate constructor,Object[] arguments,CreationContext context,Type[] signature) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 367
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateConstructorArguments(ConstructorCandidate constructor,Type[]& signature) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 344
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 107
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\DefaultComponentActivator.cs: line 85
at Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\ComponentActivator\AbstractComponentActivator.cs: line 75
at Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext context) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Lifestyle\SingletonLifestyleManager.cs: line 50
at Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.ResolveCore(CreationContext context,Boolean instanceRequired) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\Handlers\AbstractHandler.cs: line 770
at Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler handler,IDictionary additionalArguments) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\MicroKernel\DefaultKernel.cs: line 880
at Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\Windsor\WindsorContainer.cs: line 889
at Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve() in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\1ab5e0b25b145b19\src\Castle.Windsor\Windsor\WindsorContainer.cs: line 978
at CastleTests.TestArrayResolver.ArrayResolution_UnresolvableDependencyCausesResolutionFailure() in TestArrayResolver.cs: line 54

我已经确认了2.5中的正确(无异常抛出)行为,并确认了2.5.1中的错误行为,以及主干版本2146和2137.

解决方法

毛里西奥指出这一点现已修复(添加此答案以便可以关闭该问题)

版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点与技术仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至 dio@foxmail.com 举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。

相关推荐


什么是设计模式一套被反复使用、多数人知晓的、经过分类编目的、代码 设计经验 的总结;使用设计模式是为了 可重用 代码、让代码 更容易 被他人理解、保证代码 可靠性;设计模式使代码编制  真正工程化;设计模式使软件工程的 基石脉络, 如同大厦的结构一样;并不直接用来完成代码的编写,而是 描述 在各种不同情况下,要怎么解决问题的一种方案;能使不稳定依赖于相对稳定、具体依赖于相对抽象,避免引
单一职责原则定义(Single Responsibility Principle,SRP)一个对象应该只包含 单一的职责,并且该职责被完整地封装在一个类中。Every  Object should have  a single responsibility, and that responsibility should be entirely encapsulated by t
动态代理和CGLib代理分不清吗,看看这篇文章,写的非常好,强烈推荐。原文截图*************************************************************************************************************************原文文本************
适配器模式将一个类的接口转换成客户期望的另一个接口,使得原本接口不兼容的类可以相互合作。
策略模式定义了一系列算法族,并封装在类中,它们之间可以互相替换,此模式让算法的变化独立于使用算法的客户。
设计模式讲的是如何编写可扩展、可维护、可读的高质量代码,它是针对软件开发中经常遇到的一些设计问题,总结出来的一套通用的解决方案。
模板方法模式在一个方法中定义一个算法的骨架,而将一些步骤延迟到子类中,使得子类可以在不改变算法结构的情况下,重新定义算法中的某些步骤。
迭代器模式提供了一种方法,用于遍历集合对象中的元素,而又不暴露其内部的细节。
外观模式又叫门面模式,它提供了一个统一的(高层)接口,用来访问子系统中的一群接口,使得子系统更容易使用。
单例模式(Singleton Design Pattern)保证一个类只能有一个实例,并提供一个全局访问点。
组合模式可以将对象组合成树形结构来表示“整体-部分”的层次结构,使得客户可以用一致的方式处理个别对象和对象组合。
装饰者模式能够更灵活的,动态的给对象添加其它功能,而不需要修改任何现有的底层代码。
观察者模式(Observer Design Pattern)定义了对象之间的一对多依赖,当对象状态改变的时候,所有依赖者都会自动收到通知。
代理模式为对象提供一个代理,来控制对该对象的访问。代理模式在不改变原始类代码的情况下,通过引入代理类来给原始类附加功能。
工厂模式(Factory Design Pattern)可细分为三种,分别是简单工厂,工厂方法和抽象工厂,它们都是为了更好的创建对象。
状态模式允许对象在内部状态改变时,改变它的行为,对象看起来好像改变了它的类。
命令模式将请求封装为对象,能够支持请求的排队执行、记录日志、撤销等功能。
备忘录模式(Memento Pattern)保存一个对象的某个状态,以便在适当的时候恢复对象。备忘录模式属于行为型模式。 基本介绍 **意图:**在不破坏封装性的前提下,捕获一个对象的内部状态,并在该
顾名思义,责任链模式(Chain of Responsibility Pattern)为请求创建了一个接收者对象的链。这种模式给予请求的类型,对请求的发送者和接收者进行解耦。这种类型的设计模式属于行为
享元模式(Flyweight Pattern)(轻量级)(共享元素)主要用于减少创建对象的数量,以减少内存占用和提高性能。这种类型的设计模式属于结构型模式,它提供了减少对象数量从而改善应用所需的对象结