如何解决LinuxPerfAsmProfiler显示适用于Java 8的Java代码对应的汇编热点,而不适用于Java 14
在调查与Spring的org.springframework.util.ConcurrentReferenceHashMap
(自spring-core-5.1.3.RELEASE
起)的实例化有关的问题时,我使用JMH随附的LinuxPerfAsmProfiler
来剖析生成的程序集。
我只是运行这个
@Benchmark
public Object measureInit() {
return new ConcurrentReferenceHashMap<>();
}
通过JDK 8上的基准测试,可以识别出非显而易见的热点之一:
0.61% 0x00007f32d92772ea: lock addl $0x0,(%rsp) ;*putfield count
; - org.springframework.util.ConcurrentReferenceHashMap$Segment::<init>@11 (line 476)
; - org.springframework.util.ConcurrentReferenceHashMap::<init>@141 (line 184)
15.81% 0x00007f32d92772ef: mov 0x60(%r15),%rdx
这将不必要的默认值分配给了volatile字段:
protected final class Segment extends ReentrantLock {
private volatile int count = 0;
}
和Segment
依次在CCRHM
的构造函数中循环实例化:
public ConcurrentReferenceHashMap(
int initialCapacity,float loadFactor,int concurrencyLevel,ReferenceType referenceType) {
this.loadFactor = loadFactor;
this.shift = calculateShift(concurrencyLevel,MAXIMUM_CONCURRENCY_LEVEL);
int size = 1 << this.shift;
this.referenceType = referenceType;
int roundedUpSegmentCapacity = (int) ((initialCapacity + size - 1L) / size);
this.segments = (Segment[]) Array.newInstance(Segment.class,size);
for (int i = 0; i < this.segments.length; i++) {
this.segments[i] = new Segment(roundedUpSegmentCapacity);
}
}
因此,该说明可能真的很热门。程序集的完整布局可以在我的gist
中找到然后,我在JDK 14上运行相同的基准测试,然后再次使用LinuxPerfAsmProfiler
,但是现在我没有任何明确指向volatile int count = 0
in captured assembly的指针。
正在寻找lock addl $0x0
前缀下的0
分配的lock
指令,我发现了这一点:
0.08% │ 0x00007f3717d46187: lock addl $0x0,-0x40(%rsp)
23.74% │ 0x00007f3717d4618d: mov 0x120(%r15),%rbx
可能与volatile int count = 0
相对应,因为它遵循Segment
的超类ReentrantLock
的构造函数调用:
0.77% │ 0x00007f3717d46140: movq $0x0,0x18(%rax) ;*new {reexecute=0 rethrow=0 return_oop=0}
│ ; - java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock::<init>@5 (line 294)
│ ; - org.springframework.util.ConcurrentReferenceHashMap$Segment::<init>@6 (line 484)
│ ; - org.springframework.util.ConcurrentReferenceHashMap::<init>@141 (line 184)
0.06% │ 0x00007f3717d46148: mov %r8,%rcx
0.05% │ 0x00007f3717d4614b: mov %rax,%rbx
0.03% │ 0x00007f3717d4614e: shr $0x3,%rbx
0.74% │ 0x00007f3717d46152: mov %ebx,0xc(%r8)
0.06% │ 0x00007f3717d46156: mov %rax,%rbx
0.05% │ 0x00007f3717d46159: xor %rcx,%rbx
0.02% │ 0x00007f3717d4615c: shr $0x14,%rbx
0.72% │ 0x00007f3717d46160: test %rbx,%rbx
╭ │ 0x00007f3717d46163: je 0x00007f3717d4617f
│ │ 0x00007f3717d46165: shr $0x9,%rcx
│ │ 0x00007f3717d46169: movabs $0x7f370a872000,%rdi
│ │ 0x00007f3717d46173: add %rcx,%rdi
│ │ 0x00007f3717d46176: cmpb $0x8,(%rdi)
0.00% │ │ 0x00007f3717d46179: jne 0x00007f3717d46509
0.04% ↘ │ 0x00007f3717d4617f: movl $0x0,0x14(%r8)
0.08% │ 0x00007f3717d46187: lock addl $0x0,%rbx
问题是我在生成的程序集中根本没有提到putfield count
。
谁能解释为什么我看不到它?
版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点与技术仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至 dio@foxmail.com 举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。